Skip to content

Issues: cplusplus/sender-receiver

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort

Issues list

Relax when_all to allow other stop-token implementations than inplace_stop_token design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0
#302 opened Nov 7, 2024 by lewissbaker
run_loop::run-loop-sender should remove the item from the list when a stop-request is sent design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0 processed processed in a meeting
#293 opened Oct 15, 2024 by lewissbaker
Does basic-receiver need to constrain set_value/set_error/set_stopped on whether complete is invocable? discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet wording
#292 opened Oct 15, 2024 by lewissbaker
env and prop are relying on deprecated behavior bug Something isn't working P1
#291 opened Oct 14, 2024 by ericniebler
should queries be required to have a UUID so that there is a global canonical ordering? design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0
#289 opened Aug 28, 2024 by ericniebler
Should let_value destroy its predecessor operation-state eagerly to allow storage reuse? design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0
#287 opened Aug 14, 2024 by lewissbaker
Add support for strand-schedulers design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet enhancement New feature or request
#285 opened Aug 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
the preconditions on run_loop::run() are too strict bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting wording
#280 opened Jul 18, 2024 by ericniebler
noexcept clause of basic-state constructor is incomplete bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting wording
#279 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
Should the default implementation of bulk support cancellation? design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#278 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
bulk doesn't explicitly grant permissions for customisations to execute f concurrently bug Something isn't working design P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting wording
#277 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
bulk does not specify what customizations need to do with exceptions thrown from invocations of f bug Something isn't working design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#276 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
ProTip! Exclude everything labeled bug with -label:bug.