-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 257
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cfc style updates #4080
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Cfc style updates #4080
Conversation
Only occurrence specifically referring to an SC by name should be upper case, as per style guide
matching W3C style guide
match W3C styling
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
As per https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Style web/Web capitalization web - lowercase as adjective, such as "web accessibility", "web page", "web application" Web - can capitalize when referring to the World Wide Web, or leave lower case for consistency within a document
@shawna-slh if you have time to eyeball this and confirm I haven't unintentionally altered something that should remain capitalized (i.e., the start of a sentence), I would welcome. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mbgower I found a few case typos. Comments inline. If I were more confident, I would just make the edits.
guidelines/index.html
Outdated
</li> | ||
<li> | ||
<p><strong>Guidelines</strong> - Under the principles are guidelines. The 13 guidelines provide the basic goals that authors should work toward in order to make content more accessible to users with different disabilities. The guidelines are not testable, but provide the framework and overall objectives to help authors understand the success criteria and better implement the techniques.</p> | ||
</li> | ||
<li> | ||
<p><strong>Success Criteria</strong> - For each guideline, testable success criteria are provided to allow WCAG 2.2 to be used where requirements and conformance testing are necessary such as in design specification, purchasing, regulation, and contractual agreements. In order to meet the needs of different groups and different situations, three levels of conformance are defined: A (lowest), AA, and AAA (highest). Additional information on WCAG levels can be found in <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/conformance#levels">Understanding Levels of Conformance</a>.</p> | ||
<p><strong>success criteria</strong> - For each guideline, testable success criteria are provided to allow WCAG 2.2 to be used where requirements and conformance testing are necessary such as in design specification, purchasing, regulation, and contractual agreements. In order to meet the needs of different groups and different situations, three levels of conformance are defined: A (lowest), AA, and AAA (highest). Additional information on WCAG levels can be found in <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/conformance#levels">Understanding Levels of Conformance</a>.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Success criteria should use title case since paragraph does that:
Sufficient and Advisory Techniques
@@ -539,8 +539,8 @@ <h2>Statement of Partial Conformance - Language</h2> | |||
|
|||
<section class="informative" id="privacy-summary"> | |||
<h2>Privacy Considerations</h2> | |||
<p>Success Criteria within this specification which the Working Group has identified possible implications for privacy, either by providing protections for end users or which are important for web site providers to take in to consideration when implementing features designed to protect user privacy, are listed below. This list reflects the current understanding of the Working Group but other Success Criteria may have privacy implications that the Working Group is not aware of at the time of publishing.</p> | |||
<p>Success Criteria within this specification that may relate to privacy are:</p> | |||
<p>Success criteria within this specification which the Working Group has identified possible implications for privacy, either by providing protections for end users or which are important for website providers to take in to consideration when implementing features designed to protect user privacy, are listed below. This list reflects the current understanding of the Working Group but other Success criteria may have privacy implications that the Working Group is not aware of at the time of publishing.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...other Success criteria
I am not sure if both words should be capitalized, but one of the two is wrong.
@@ -550,8 +550,8 @@ <h2>Privacy Considerations</h2> | |||
|
|||
<section class="informative" id="security-summary"> | |||
<h2>Security Considerations</h2> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as previous comment, other Success criteria
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approve after we double check line 56 of index.html on call.
guidelines/index.html
Outdated
</li> | ||
<li> | ||
<p><strong>Guidelines</strong> - Under the principles are guidelines. The 13 guidelines provide the basic goals that authors should work toward in order to make content more accessible to users with different disabilities. The guidelines are not testable, but provide the framework and overall objectives to help authors understand the success criteria and better implement the techniques.</p> | ||
</li> | ||
<li> | ||
<p><strong>Success Criteria</strong> - For each guideline, testable success criteria are provided to allow WCAG 2.2 to be used where requirements and conformance testing are necessary such as in design specification, purchasing, regulation, and contractual agreements. In order to meet the needs of different groups and different situations, three levels of conformance are defined: A (lowest), AA, and AAA (highest). Additional information on WCAG levels can be found in <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/conformance#levels">Understanding Levels of Conformance</a>.</p> | ||
<p><strong>success criteria</strong> - For each guideline, testable success criteria are provided to allow WCAG 2.2 to be used where requirements and conformance testing are necessary such as in design specification, purchasing, regulation, and contractual agreements. In order to meet the needs of different groups and different situations, three levels of conformance are defined: A (lowest), AA, and AAA (highest). Additional information on WCAG levels can be found in <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/conformance#levels">Understanding Levels of Conformance</a>.</p> | ||
</li> | ||
<li> | ||
<p><strong>Sufficient and Advisory Techniques</strong> - For each of the <em>guidelines</em> and <em>success criteria</em> in the WCAG 2.2 document itself, the working group has also documented a wide variety of <em>techniques</em>. The techniques are informative and fall into two categories: those that are <em>sufficient</em> for meeting the success criteria and those that are <em>advisory</em>. The advisory techniques go beyond what is required by the individual success criteria and allow authors to better address the guidelines. Some advisory techniques address accessibility barriers that are not covered by the testable success criteria. Where common failures are known, these are also documented. See also <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/understanding-techniques">Sufficient and Advisory Techniques in Understanding WCAG 2.2</a>.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<p><strong>Sufficient and Advisory Techniques</strong> - For each of the <em>guidelines</em> and <em>success criteria</em> in the WCAG 2.2 document itself, the working group has also documented a wide variety of <em>techniques</em>. The techniques are informative and fall into two categories: those that are <em>sufficient</em> for meeting the success criteria and those that are <em>advisory</em>. The advisory techniques go beyond what is required by the individual success criteria and allow authors to better address the guidelines. Some advisory techniques address accessibility barriers that are not covered by the testable success criteria. Where common failures are known, these are also documented. See also <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/understanding-techniques">Sufficient and Advisory Techniques in Understanding WCAG 2.2</a>.</p> | |
<p><strong>Sufficient and advisory techniques</strong> - For each of the <em>guidelines</em> and <em>success criteria</em> in the WCAG 2.2 document itself, the working group has also documented a wide variety of <em>techniques</em>. The techniques are informative and fall into two categories: those that are <em>sufficient</em> for meeting the success criteria and those that are <em>advisory</em>. The advisory techniques go beyond what is required by the individual success criteria and allow authors to better address the guidelines. Some advisory techniques address accessibility barriers that are not covered by the testable success criteria. Where common failures are known, these are also documented. See also <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/understanding-techniques">Sufficient and Advisory Techniques in Understanding WCAG 2.2</a>.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@shawna-slh what's your feeling on these?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm outside of the question about title casing the list items - i'm personally fine with whatever the resolution to that ends up being.
Discussed on TF call, with consensus on changes. @mbgower is going to check with @shawna-slh on use of title case with Layers of Guidance section. |
Co-authored-by: Mike Gower <[email protected]>
Discussed on backlog call 10/4, reverting to keeping title case for first word(s) following bullets of Layers of Guidance. |
Style changes to normative documents made to ensure consistency as part of the republishing of WCAG 2.2
Preview | Diff