Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: Add event definition for 'close' #384

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 8, 2022
Merged

Conversation

inexorabletash
Copy link
Member

@inexorabletash inexorabletash commented Jun 3, 2022

A reference to a 'close' event turned into a link back in d2bc4db but
there wasn't a local definition - it ended up linking into HTML! This
is now triggering a Bikeshed warning - yay!

Add a minimal local definition for the event type, like the others.

(No normative behavior changes, no tests required.)


Preview | Diff

A reference to a 'close' event turned into a link back in d2bc4db but
there wasn't a local definition - it ended up linking into HTML! This
is now triggering a Bikeshed warning - yay!

Add a minimal local definition for the event type, like the others.
@inexorabletash
Copy link
Member Author

@asutherland could you take a quick look?

@inexorabletash inexorabletash mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2022
5 tasks
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Brett Zamir <[email protected]>
@inexorabletash
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @brettz9 !

Copy link
Member

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems fine descriptively. Presumedly, there is text elsewhere in the spec that queues a task to fire the event using the right task source?

@inexorabletash
Copy link
Member Author

The task source integration could be tightened up; there's just a generic declaration that everything happens using the database access task source. Firing of the event happens in close a database connection

@inexorabletash inexorabletash merged commit e196c63 into main Jun 8, 2022
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
SHA: e196c63
Reason: push, by @inexorabletash

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@inexorabletash inexorabletash deleted the closelink branch March 3, 2023 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants