Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KEP-Template: Fix KEP validation to correctly handle deprecated->disabled->removed releases. #5049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2025

Conversation

vinayakankugoyal
Copy link
Contributor

The validation assumes release stages for a feature to only be Alpha->Beta->Stable but now we have another sort of release for removal of functionality that follows Deprecated->Disabled->Removed stages, so we need to update the KEP unit and verification tests to support these types of KEP proposals.

  • Issue link:
  • Other comments:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/enhancements Issues or PRs related to the Enhancements subproject kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 17, 2025
@vinayakankugoyal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @thockin @HirazawaUi

@vinayakankugoyal vinayakankugoyal changed the title Fix KEP validation to correctly handle deprecated->disabled->removed releases. KEP-Template: Fix KEP validation to correctly handle deprecated->disabled->removed releases. Jan 17, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

This PR may require API review.

If so, when the changes are ready, complete the pre-review checklist and request an API review.

Status of requested reviews is tracked in the API Review project.

@vinayakankugoyal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/kind bug

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Jan 17, 2025
@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Jan 18, 2025

Thanks!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 18, 2025
@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Jan 18, 2025

@johnbelamaric who has super approver in this repo (again)

@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johnbelamaric, thockin, vinayakankugoyal

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a8e9e87 into kubernetes:master Jan 18, 2025
4 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.33 milestone Jan 18, 2025
@vinayakankugoyal vinayakankugoyal deleted the deps branch January 18, 2025 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/enhancements Issues or PRs related to the Enhancements subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants