Fix: Replace deprecated commonLabels with labels in examples directory.

[ah8ad3]

Related to #5653.
Replace commonLables inside example directory with lables to avoid deprecated message.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @ah8ad3. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

• Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
• Close this PR with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

[stormqueen1990]

/remove-lifecycle rotten
/cc

[ah8ad3]

/retest

[k8s-ci-robot]

@ah8ad3: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[stormqueen1990]

/remove-lifecycle stale

[stormqueen1990]

/lgtm
/assign @koba1t @varshaprasad96
for maintainer review

[stormqueen1990]

/kind documentation

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ah8ad3
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from koba1t. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[koba1t]

/retest

[koba1t]

@ah8ad3
Could you try rebase master?

[k8s-ci-robot]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[ah8ad3]

Could you try rebase master?

Done, PTAL

[ah8ad3]

I think the prow error was not happy about this.

Error: error unmarshaling JSON: while decoding JSON: json: unknown field "includeSelectors"

[koba1t]

/retest

[k8s-ci-robot]

@ah8ad3: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
kustomize-presubmit-master	7f420a6	link	true	/test kustomize-presubmit-master

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[koba1t]

Hi @ah8ad3
Can you investigate why that test is still failed?