-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add HEALTHCHECK support #421
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
d124525
to
5a3ea4d
Compare
Proposed Changes
This PR treats the following situations unhealthy:
In my case a plain WAN switch-over to backup WAN on the router was able to permanently make Tailscale offline. And it's not only me: tailscale/tailscale#12021 It seems to be an issue when TS is in a container. And similar bugs can happen in the future.
And after testing it in real life circumstances, TS was able to not go online even after a restart, if the transient in the WAN state was long enough. But after (re)start, we should restart the add-on again much slower, eg. to give time to authenticate on the very first time.
Note: I was able to put TS into Stopped state only manually, but maybe this can be helpful once, at least won't harm.
Note: This schema (below) would look nicer, but until a bug in the Supervisor/UI is not fixed (see #2640), we can't do this.
Related Issues