-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Implement dict to receive Object as key #119
Open
HyeockJinKim
wants to merge
1
commit into
go-python:main
Choose a base branch
from
HyeockJinKim:issue118
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is the right representation alas...
Putting the
Object
as the key means that you are relying on how Go compares interfaces. It does this with a shallow compare. An interface is basicallyso comparing two interfaces just compares the pointer to type and pointer to data - it doesn't compare the data.
This means that you could insert two objects eg
py.String("hello")
andpy.String("hello")
and these would both get inserted into the dictionary.I think what we want as the key is
And the values need to be a
[]Object
(because different objects can have the same hash).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no hash implementation, so I've got
Object
as key now.We only receive hash values as key values. so I'm going to get
int
as the key.What do you think about this way?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think maybe we should try the really simple version first, then we can make it more efficient later
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ncw, to be nit-picky, the way
py.String
is currently implemented, I believe this would work.see:
https://play.golang.org/p/bDvOEmkim6r
(ie:
py.String
just contains values and no pointers.)but ok with going with the KISS version first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed! The problem comes when the
py.Object
interface is satisfied with a pointer: https://play.golang.org/p/vf4dGmh0Gb4