Skip to content

An allocation-free, high performance coroutine framework for Unity built around the async API

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

fedeAlterio/UnityAsync

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

23 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

UnityAsync

UnityAsync is a coroutine framework for Unity built around the async API. This is not only a more efficient and effective replacement of Unity's IEnumerator coroutines, but also seamlessly integrates Unity with .NET 4+ asynchronous APIs.

With this library you can:

  • Write allocation-free coroutines
  • Seamlessly integrate with Task-based and async APIs
  • Integrate with IEnumerator-based coroutines and YieldInstructions
  • Easily switch sync contexts (main to background and vice-versa)
  • Define your own custom await instructions (allocation free, no boxing!)
  • Return results at the end of your coroutine

Performance

Rest assured; UnityAsync coroutines will generally perform better than Unity's built-in coroutines because:

  • They rarely cause heap allocations
  • They don't weave in and out of native code
  • They don't rely on a monolithic state machine

Comparing with standard yield return null update loops, performance is 150% improved. Uncached WaitForSeconds loops yield a performance increase of over 290%. The benchmarks included the time it took to instantiate the coroutines.

The one caveat is, in order to store the coroutine, a Task object must be allocated. A Task object is a bigger allocation compared to a Coroutine object. No way around it, if you want to integrate with Task-based APIs, you need to use Tasks. Often, you just need to fire the coroutine and forget about it, and in such cases, simply use void return type to avoid allocations altogether.

Usage

Installation

Clone the repo into your assets folder or download the latest release and open the .unitypackage.

Replacing existing coroutines

Let's say we want to replace a pretty straight-forward update loop IEnumerator coroutine:

using UnityEngine;
using System.Collections;

...

IEnumerator UpdateLoop()
{
	while(true)
		yield return null;
}

void Start()
{
	StartCoroutine(UpdateLoop());
}

...

UnityAsync coroutines are defined by async methods, which can return void, Task, or Task<TResult>:

using UnityEngine;
using UnityAsync;

...

async void UpdateLoop()
{
	while(true)
		await new WaitForFrames(1);
}

void Start()
{
	UpdateLoop();
}

...

Easy-peasy, right? WaitForFrames is an IAwaitInstruction. When you await it, it spawns a Continuation<T>, which is (automatically) inserted into a queue and evaluated every frame until it is finished; in this case it will take one frame. Once finished, whatever is after the IAwaitInstruction is invoked. We could return Task instead of void if we wanted to store the coroutine for nesting.

If you want to link the lifetime of an async coroutine (or part of the coroutine) to a UnityEngine.Object, like the built-in Coroutines do, see the ConfigureAwait section.

Returning a result

Let's say we have some work we want to perform across the main thread, but it's too much to perform in a single frame. We can create a coroutine for this and return the result of the work once it is finished.

using UnityEngine;
using UnityAsync;
using System.Threading.Tasks;

...

async Task<int> GenerateResult()
{
	// contrived examples are the best examples, right?
	int result = 1;
	
	for(int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
	{
		for(int j = 0; j < 100000; ++j)
			result = Mathf.Sin(result * j); 
			
		await new WaitForFrames(1);
	}
	
	return result;
}

async void Start()
{
	int result = await GenerateResult();

	// ...10 frames later
	Debug.Log(result);
}

...

We are awaiting the result in Start() so it needs to be an async method (this doesn't impact on how Unity calls it). We now return Task<int> and the result is available after 10 frames.

Switching contexts

Sometimes you'll want to perform some task on the thread pool and return to the main thread once this is completed without blocking. This could be done via Task.ConfigureAwait() but now you can await directly on a SynchronizationContext which makes it super easy to swap back and forth:

using UnityAsync;

...

async void Start()
{
	// do some work on the thread pool
	await Await.BackgroundSyncContext();
	
	// ...
	
	// resume on the main thread
	await Await.UnitySyncContext();
	
	// update Transforms, etc.
}

...

Await actually contains many shortcut functions to streamline your code.

ConfigureAwait

Just like with Tasks, UnityAsync IAwaitInstructions can be configured. You can set the scheduler (Update, LateUpdate, FixedUpdate) and also link its lifespan to a UnityEngine.Object and/or CancellationToken. Anything after the await line will not be reached if the IAwaitInstruction's linked UnityEngine.Object was destroyed. If a cancellation was requested, an exception is thrown after the await line, which can be handled as you would when a Task is cancelled.

using UnityEngine;
using UnityAsync;

...

async void Start()
{
	// continuation will finish if:
	// - 10 seconds pass or
	// - this MonoBehaviour is destroyed
	// time is evaluated every fixed update
	await Await.Seconds(10).ConfigureAwait(this, FrameScheduler.FixedUpdate);
	
	// ... if the calling MonoBehaviour was destroyed, we won't get this far
	// if it is still alive, we'll be in FixedUpdate
	
	var c = new CancellationSource(100);
	
	try
	{
		await Await.Seconds(10).ConfigureAwait(c.Token);
	}
	catch(OperationCancelledException)
	{
		// exception will be caught here after 100ms
	}
}

...

Yielding a task

You may run into a situation where some of your coroutine code is async, but it is called from an IEnumerator. In such a situation you can use Task.AsYieldInstruction or Task<TResult>.AsYieldInstruction.

using UnityEngine;
using UnityAsync;

...

IEnumerator Start()
{
	yield return new WaitForSeconds(1);
	
	Debug.Log("Click to continue...");
	
	yield return WaitForMouse().AsYieldInstruction();
	
	Debug.Log("Click!");
}

async Task WaitForMouse()
{
	await Await.Until(() => Input.GetMouseDown(0));
}

...

Await instructions / awaitables

Built-in:

  • WaitForFrames
  • WaitForSeconds
  • WaitForSecondsRealtime
  • WaitUntil1
  • WaitWhile1

Unity:

  • IEnumerator2
  • YieldInstruction2
  • AsyncOperation
  • ResourceRequest3

Others:

  • Task
  • Task<>
  • …anything that implements GetAwaiter()

1Use the generic variants to pass a state object and avoid closures.

2Will spin up a Unity Coroutine, causing allocations. Note, CustomYieldInstruction implements IEnumerator.

3Very small delegate allocation.

Anything that implements IAwaitInstruction can be awaited and will be evaluated in Update, LateUpdate, or FixedUpdate. This is how the built-in await instructions are implemented. The advantage over Tasks or CustomYieldInstructions is they don't cause any allocations if implemented as structs.

Custom await instructions

You can implement your own await instructions by implementing IAwaitInstruction.

public interface IAwaitInstruction
{
	bool IsCompleted();
}

It's dead simple, just place your behaviour in IsCompleted and return true when your criteria are met. IsCompleted will be evaluated every frame (depending on the FrameScheduler). Use a struct to avoid unnecessary allocations.

One more thing to note; GetAwaiter() is already provided through an extension method so that the instruction can encapsulate itself in an AwaitInstructionAwaiter when awaited. It is this struct which actually ends up being awaited - as a kind of decoration to make custom await instructions more straight-forward to implement (the alternative is inheritance which causes heap allocations).

using UnityAsync;

public struct WaitForTimeSpan : IAwaitInstruction
{
	readonly float finishTime;

	bool IAwaitInstruction.IsCompleted() => AsyncManager.currentTime >= finishTime;
	
	public WaitForFrames(TimeSpan timeSpan)
	{
		// we use AsyncManager.currentTime here (and above) because it's slightly more efficient vs Time.time
		finishFrame = AsyncManager.currentTime + (float)timeSpan.TotalSeconds;
	}	
}

Usage with Unity EditorTests (unit tests with NUnit)

When running unit tests, AsyncManager is not automatically initialized. Call AsyncManager.InitializeForEditorTests() in your test OneTimeSetUp method, for example like this:

// In your test class

[OneTimeSetUp]
public void OneTimeSetUp()
{
	AsyncManager.InitializeForEditorTests();

	// Other setup code here
}

About

An allocation-free, high performance coroutine framework for Unity built around the async API

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • C# 100.0%