Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: Simplify hashing for BloomFilter #416

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Stranger6667
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.19%. Comparing base (d3ed021) to head (7ae94e0).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #416      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.22%   89.19%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        1921     1915       -6     
==========================================
- Hits         1714     1708       -6     
  Misses        207      207              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 4, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #416 will not alter performance

Comparing dd/perf-hash (7ae94e0) with master (77df607)

Summary

✅ 6 untouched benchmarks

@Stranger6667 Stranger6667 merged commit 58736a2 into master Jan 5, 2025
65 checks passed
@Stranger6667 Stranger6667 deleted the dd/perf-hash branch January 5, 2025 12:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant