feat: added map view tab and coming soon message for the map detail view #6404
+188
−9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
1 similar comment
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to b19164b in 56 seconds
More details
- Looked at
290lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. frontend/src/pages/InfraMonitoringHosts/utils.tsx:37
- Draft comment:
Consider using a more descriptive key for the 'Map View' tab instead ofPANEL_TYPES.TIME_SERIES. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment suggests a code quality improvement by recommending a more descriptive key. However, without knowing the context ofPANEL_TYPES.TIME_SERIES, it's hard to judge if this is necessary. The key might be part of a larger system whereTIME_SERIESis appropriate. The comment is speculative without strong evidence that a change is required.
The comment might be valid ifPANEL_TYPES.TIME_SERIESis indeed misleading or incorrect for a 'Map View'. However, without additional context, it's speculative.
Given the lack of context, it's safer to assume the current key is appropriate unless there's clear evidence otherwise.
Delete the comment as it is speculative and lacks strong evidence that a change is required.
2. frontend/src/pages/InfraMonitoringHosts/index.tsx:2
- Draft comment:
Avoid using thecomponent/index.tsxfile structure approach, as it makes it difficult to debug and find components using global search tools like VS Code. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_IvZeHlwxRhUQlRKQ
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| items={getTabsItems()} | ||
| className="infra-monitoring-tabs" | ||
| type="card" | ||
| defaultActiveKey={activeTab} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
defaultActiveKey is redundant when activeKey is controlled by state. Consider removing it.
Suggested change
| defaultActiveKey={activeTab} |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Related Issues / PR's
Screenshots
Affected Areas and Manually Tested Areas