Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 20, 2018. It is now read-only.

RxJS version 2.3.23
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
@mattpodwysocki mattpodwysocki released this 14 Jan 21:31
· 1240 commits to master since this release
v2.3.23
9fd10f9

This release has a number of new features as well as improvements to the existing codebase.

Of note, there are the following items changed:

  • New Operators
  • Performance Enhancements
  • Bug Fixes
  • Documentation fixes

New Operators

In this version, a number of new operators are now available

Observable.pairs

One question that was posed to the team, what if we could take an object and turn it into an observable of key/value pairs? To that end, we have implemented Observable.pairs, which is an implementation which mirrors Lo-Dash and Underscore.js but instead of returning an array of key/value arrays, it returns an Observable of key/value arrays.

Using this together with ES6 produces quite a nice result with destructuring of the arrays.

let obj = {
  foo: 42,
  bar: 56,
  baz: 78
};

let source = Rx.Observable.pairs(obj);

let subscription = source.subscribe(
  [key, value] => {
    console.log('Key:', key, 'Value:', value);
  },
  err => {
    console.log('Error: %s', err);
  },
  => () {
    console.log('Completed');
  });

// => Key: 'foo' Value: 42
// => Key: 'bar' Value: 56
// => Key: 'baz' Value: 78
// => Completed

This is a great alternative to using a much longer form of:

var obj = {
  foo: 42,
  bar: 56,
  baz: 78
};

var source = Observable.from(Object.keys(obj))
  .map(function (x) { return [x, obj[x]]; });

Observable.prototype.retryWhen

In previous releases of RxJS, for retrying behavior, we had a single operator of Observable.prototype.retry which would try running the observable the specified number of times. This is acceptable behavior for immediate retries, but for more complex scenarios, we want this behavior to be more configurable. To that end, we have implemented Observable.prototype.retryWhen which comes from RxJava.

The retryWhen operator is similar to retry but decides whether or not to resubscribe to and mirror the source Observable by passing the Error from the onError notification to a function that generates a second Observable, and observes its result to determine what to do. If that result is an emitted item, retryWhen resubscribes to and mirrors the source and the process repeats; if that result is an onError notification, retryWhen passes this notification on to its observers and terminates.

This allows for an eventual back-off strategy to handle failures such as the following:

var source = Observable.create(function (o) {
    console.log('subscribing');
    o.onError(new Error('always fails'));
  })
  .retryWhen(function(attempts) {
    return attempts
      .zip(Observable.range(1, 3), function (n, i) { return i; })
      .flatMap(function(i) { 
        console.log('delay retry by', i, 'second(s)');
        return Observable.timer(i * 1000 /*ms*/);
      });
  }); 

source.subscribe();
/*
subscribing
delay retry by 1 second(s)
subscribing
delay retry by 2 second(s)
subscribing
delay retry by 3 second(s)
subscribing
*/

Many thanks to @Blesh for the implementation!

Observable.prototype.withLatestFrom

RxJS has many ways of combining observable sequences whether it is zip which waits for pairs, which could penalize the faster of the observables which produce values. RxJS also has combineLatest which allows you to combine the latest value from each of the observable sequences which allows you to no longer be penalized by a slower observable sequence, instead, you will get each one in turn, as part of the pair.

There may be times, however, when you only want the latest values from the other sequences, produced with the source sequence. To that end, we have introduced the Observable.prototype.withLatestFrom method which merges the specified observable sequences into one observable sequence by using the selector function only when the source observable sequence (the instance) produces an element.

/* Have staggering intervals */
var source1 = Rx.Observable.interval(140)
    .map(function (i) { return 'First: ' + i; });

var source2 = Rx.Observable.interval(50)
    .map(function (i) { return 'Second: ' + i; });

// When source1 emits a value, combine it with the latest emission from source2.
var source = source1.withLatestFrom(
    source2,
    function (s1, s2) { return s1 + ', ' + s2; }
).take(4);

var subscription = source.subscribe(
    function (x) {
        console.log('Next: ' + x.toString());
    },
    function (err) {
        console.log('Error: ' + err);
    },
    function () {
        console.log('Completed');
    });

// => Next: First: 0, Second: 1
// => Next: First: 1, Second: 4
// => Next: First: 2, Second: 7
// => Next: First: 3, Second: 10
// => Completed

Many thanks to @staltz for the implementation!

Performance Improvements

RxJS is committed to being as high performance as possible. To fix some issues, we have reverted the usage of Function.prototype.bind which is incredibly slow as of this date. In addition, we have removed some composition from some operators and implementing them as standalone operators.

The following operators should have much better performance including:

  • Observable.prototype.concatAll
  • Observable.prototype.concatMap
  • Observable.prototype.filter
  • Observable.prototype.flatMap
  • Observable.prototype.map
  • Observable.prototype.merge
  • Observable.prototype.mergeAll
  • Observable.prototype.reduce

In the coming point releases, we will be continuously striving for better performance.

Bug Fixes

The following bugs were fixed:

Documentation Fixes

As always, we are adding more documentation for RxJS to help you better understand the library and why you should use RxJS versus other libraries, as well as the mapping concepts between the libraries.

Going forward, you will be able to find the RxJS documentation along with all other languages supported on the reactivex.io home page, which is the home for all implementations of Rx.

We'd like to thank the following for submitting bug fixes for our documentation: @scouten, @artemyarulin, @lazaruslarue, @andrewk, @adm72, @eladb, @YuvalZiegler, @jca02266, @erykpiast, @saraid, @paddlefish, @kt3k, and @38elements! You are what make RxJS so awesome!

Assets 2
Loading