Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(botocore): [SVLS-5973] less noisy span pointers [backport 2.16] #11422

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 2.16
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Backport ecd0ab1 from #11353 to 2.16.

Span pointer issues should be debug messages rather than warnings since they are not really actionable from the perspective of our users.

We'd also like to have some instrumentation telemetry to see how the logic is doing.

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

Span pointer issues should be debug messages rather than warnings since
they are not really actionable from the perspective of our users.

We'd also like to have some instrumentation telemetry to see how the
logic is doing.

## Checklist
- [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
- The PR description includes an overview of the change
- The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
- The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing
strategy
- The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- The change follows the [library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
- The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
- Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))

## Reviewer Checklist
- [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
- Title is accurate
- All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- Newly-added code is easy to change
- Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance
implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

(cherry picked from commit ecd0ab1)
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: backport-11353-to-2.16
Commit report: 539909e
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 598 Passed, 688 Skipped, 19m 26.91s Total duration (17m 37.27s time saved)

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-11-15 19:06:48

Comparing candidate commit 539909e in PR branch backport-11353-to-2.16 with baseline commit 50ef691 in branch 2.16.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 388 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

@apiarian-datadog
Copy link
Contributor

restarting the pr to hopefully fix pipelines.

Copy link
Contributor Author

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

ddtrace/_trace/telemetry.py                                             @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
ddtrace/_trace/utils_botocore/span_pointers/telemetry.py                @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
releasenotes/notes/reduce-span-pointer-noise-e1cf01ec581a409c.yaml      @DataDog/apm-python
tests/tracer/test_telemetry.py                                          @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
ddtrace/_trace/_span_pointer.py                                         @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
ddtrace/_trace/utils_botocore/span_pointers/__init__.py                 @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
ddtrace/_trace/utils_botocore/span_pointers/dynamodb.py                 @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
ddtrace/_trace/utils_botocore/span_pointers/s3.py                       @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python
tests/tracer/utils_botocore/test_span_pointers.py                       @DataDog/apm-sdk-api-python

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant