Set<*>.containsExactly

[oldergod]

The assertion containsExactly doesn't exist for Sets. Is there a reason to this? One has to transform the type to use either the list or the array assertion.

[evant]

It's because containsExactly cares about order and Sets don't have a defined order. You can use containsOnly if you don't care about ordering or convert it to a list to define the order.

[oldergod]

Oh interesting. I forgot about it because assertj offers this method. Thank you then!