You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, it is not always possible to canonicalize at parse time. For instance, if any of the stops' x values is calc(0.5 + 0.2 * sign(1em - 1px)), we may need to wait until the style is computed before we know if it needs to be clamped to the previous point or not. How do we handle this? What if some of the stops may be resolvable but not all of them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-easing/#funcdef-linear specifies:
“If an argument lacks a , its input progress value is initially empty, but that is immediately corrected by linear() canonicalization after parsing.”
However, it is not always possible to canonicalize at parse time. For instance, if any of the stops' x values is
calc(0.5 + 0.2 * sign(1em - 1px))
, we may need to wait until the style is computed before we know if it needs to be clamped to the previous point or not. How do we handle this? What if some of the stops may be resolvable but not all of them?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: