Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[wg/service-workers] "Adopted Specification" #354

Open
frivoal opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[wg/service-workers] "Adopted Specification" #354

frivoal opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@frivoal
Copy link
Contributor

frivoal commented Apr 25, 2021

Sorry for not noticing this earlier.

In section 2.2, the current wording of the service workers charter uses "Adopted specification" to link to Community Group reports it plans to take up. While it's good to link to those, the term "Adopted specification" is very close to "Adopted Draft", which is a term defined by the Process to refer specifically to Working Drafts or other Recommendation-track documents adopted from another Working Group. As the these have different patent policy implications, I think it would be better not to use terminology that is so close and might cause confusion. Something like this would seem fine:

Draft state: < href="…">Community Group Report</a> from WICG

@plehegar plehegar changed the title [service workers] "Adopted Specification" [wg/service-workers] "Adopted Specification" Sep 25, 2023
@plehegar
Copy link
Member

@ylafon , apparently, we missed this issue when the Group was recharter earlier in the year :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants