-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify aria-autocomplete
and autocomplete
semantic equivalency
#2337
Comments
aria-autocomplete
relationship with autocomplete
attributearia-autocomplete
and autocomplete
semantic equivalency
Just to add: https://w3c.github.io/html-aam/#att-autocomplete-form says
|
there is overlap, but they aren't entirely equivalent. also from HTML AAM:
there may need to be some more nuance to that user agents MUST in html aam... the intent there was likely to handle situations like but, to the point of the OP, |
The HTML Accessibility API Mappings 1.0 (W3C Editor's Draft) spec needs some editing clarification: section on 3.6.12 autocomplete - form
section on 3.6.13 autocomplete - input, select and textarea
Remove the confusing & redundant comment :" |
Describe your concern
I've been reading through the specs regarding these two attributes and can't clearly identify if
aria-autocomplete
is semantically equivalent to HTML'sautocomplete
. I see a significant number of implementations of ComboBoxes usingautocomplete="off"
to instruct the browser to not use it's native autofill functionality (despite sometimes not being respected like in chrome). They additionally usearia-autocomplete="list"
on the same element to convey the usage/presence of a custom listbox.Is it an acceptable practice to use both
aria-autocomplete
andautocomplete
on a ComboBox and other elements/widgets, or should only one of these be used?Link to the version of the specification or documentation you were looking at at.
Does the issue exists in the editors draft (the editors draft is the most recent draft of the specification)?
Yes
Related: w3c/aria-practices#639
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: