New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inconsistent cEP metadata number format #120

Open

refeed opened this issue May 5, 2018 · 3 comments

Labels

Member

refeed commented May 5, 2018 •

edited

Loading

In cEP-0000 and cEP-0001, the cEP number in the metadata table uses "XXXX" (e.g 0001) format. However, in cEP-0002 the number in the metadata table uses "X" (e.g 2). and cEP-0003 uses the XXXX format, and so on

This isn't consistent. Is there any rules regarding to cEP number formatting? if no, I think we need to choose one between those two format to stop this inconsistencies.

gitmate-bot added the difficulty/newcomer label

Member Author

refeed commented May 5, 2018

cc @jayvdb @sils @sims1253 @Makman2

jayvdb added process/pending review and removed difficulty/newcomer labels

Member

jayvdb commented May 6, 2018

cEP-0 says the metadata includes the number. I think the metadata should be just the number, without leading zeros.

jayvdb mentioned this issue

cEP-0018: Integration of ANTLR in coala #124

Merged

Member

li-boxuan commented May 11, 2018

@jayvdb Why does this issue have process/pending review label? Shouldn't that only be used in pull requests?

gitmate-bot added the status/STALE label

Makman2 removed process/pending review status/STALE labels

gitmate-bot added the status/STALE label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment