- Overview
- Specific responsibilities
- Kubernetes Release Team roles
- Other activities of the Release Team
- Release Team Selection
- Milestone Maintainers
- Filing exceptions
- Visual Release Path
The Kubernetes Release Team is embedded within SIG Release and is responsible for the day to day work required to successfully release while the SIG at large is focused on the continued improvement of the release process. Historically the Release Manager (previously Release Czar) and later Release Team has assumed the following responsibilities
- Authority to build and publish releases at the published release date under the auspices of the CNCF
- Authority to accept or reject cherrypick merge requests to the release branch
- Authority to accept or reject PRs to the kubernetes/kubernetes master branch during code freeze period
- Changing the release timeline as needed if keeping it would materially impact the stability or quality of the release these responsibilities will continue to be discharged by SIG release through the Release Team. This charter grants SIG Release the following additional responsibilities
- Authority to revert code changes which imperil the ability to produce a release by the communicated date or otherwise negatively impact the quality of the release (e.g. insufficient testing, lack of documentation)
- Authority to guard code changes behind a feature flag which do not meet criteria for release
- Authority to close the submit queue to any changes which do not target the release as part of enforcing the code freeze period which shall be the discharged by the Release Team.
- Generation of release notes
- Communicate enhancement burndown progress during a release cycle
- Manage repositories and tooling dedicated to releasing Kubernetes which at time of chartering these include:
- kubernetes/release
- deb/rpm packaging and hosting
- Container image hosting
- Set and enforce criteria for repository inclusion in a Kubernetes release
- Governance
- Stabilization
- Test coverage
- Set and enforce criteria for code inclusion in a Kubernetes release
- Feature flags
- Documentation
- Test coverage
- Dashboards
- Status reports
- Define template and format for communication of release status
- Ongoing status of the release process
- Announcement of alpha, beta, release candidate availability
- Announcement of release availability
- Deriving signal from the following sources
- test grid
- GitHub flake issues
- GitHub bug issues
- Identifying owning individuals and SIGs for blocking issues
- Working with SIGs and individuals to drive resolution of open issues
- Building summary of release criteria and status and publish to the community on a regular basis throughout the release cycle
- Manage the contents of
kubernetes/enhancements
- Define burndown process
- use of GitHub labels to signal release blocking status
- use of GitHub milestones to communicate release blocking issues
- use of flake GitHub issue count or CI signal as a release blocking status
- Coordinate the resolution of release blocking issues
As documented in the Kubernetes Versioning doc, there are 3 types of Kubernetes releases:
- Major (x.0.0)
- Minor (x.x.0)
- Patch (x.x.x)
Role | Handbook |
---|---|
Release Team Lead | Lead Handbook |
Enhancements | Enhancements Handbook |
CI Signal | CI Signal Handbook |
Bug Triage | Bug Triage Handbook |
Docs | Docs Handbook |
Release Notes | Release Notes Handbook |
Communications | Communications Handbook |
- Patch Release Manager: moved to a role of Release Managers, which operates under the Release Engineering subproject.
- Branch Manager: moved to a role of Release Managers, which operates under the Release Engineering subproject.
- Test Infra: deprecated at the end of Kubernetes 1.15. Duties are now distributed to the Branch Manager and Test Infra On-call (SIG Testing) (#testing-ops and #sig-testing on Slack).
Any Release Team member may select one or more mentees to shadow the release process in order to help fulfill future Release Team staffing requirements and continue to grow the Kubernetes community in general. Potential mentees should be prepared to devote a significant amount of time to shadowing their mentor during the release cycle. Successful Release Team Shadows should be prepared to assume a lead role in a subsequent release.
Release responsibilities of individual contributors to the Kubernetes project are captured below
If you have a patch that needs to be ported back to a previous release (meaning it is a critical bug/security fix), once it is merged to the Kubernetes master
branch:
- Follow the cherry-pick instructions to open a cherry-pick PR.
- The Patch Release Manager will then review the PR and if it is ok for cherry-picking, will apply a
cherrypick-approved
label to it.
If you are developing an enhancement for Kubernetes, make sure that an issue is open in the enhancements repository. If you are targeting a particular release, make sure the issue is marked with the corresponding release milestone.
Ensure that all code for your enhancement is written, tested, reviewed, and merged before code freeze date for the target release.
During the code freeze period, fix any bugs discovered with your enhancement, and write enhancement documentation.
- Make sure your enhancement for the upcoming release is on the github release tracking board (e.g. link for 1.26).
- Create a PR with documentation for your enhancement in the documents repo.
- Your PR should target the release branch (e.g. release-1.6), not the
master
branch.- Any changes to the master branch become live on https://kubernetes.io/docs/ as soon as they are merged, and for releases we do not want documentation to go live until the release is cut.
- Your PR should target the release branch (e.g. release-1.6), not the
- Add link to your docs PR in the release tracking board, and notify the docs lead for the release ( Release team details for each release can be found under the releases directory. E.g. Docs lead for 1.26).
- The docs lead will review your PR and give you feedback.
- Once approved, the docs lead will merge your PR into the release branch.
- When the release is cut, the docs lead will push the docs release branch to master, making your docs live on https://kubernetes.io/docs/.
To date no major release has been scheduled, however, SIG Release would be responsible for working closely with SIG Testing to coordinate this effort across SIGs. The precise work required to produce a major release (e.g. 2.0, 3.0) is undefined.
For all unplanned or embargoed releases
- Facilitate security releases following the Security Release Process
If you're interested in learning more about how the Release Team is selected, as well as how to volunteer, please review the Release Team Selection Process.
The milestone maintainers are responsible for adding, adapting, or removing a milestone, e.g. the next major Kubernetes release, on an enhancement, issue, PR.
Across release cycles, a "/milestone" is one of the best signals for issue triage whether or not an issue or PR is actually targeted for the current release milestone.
Each release cycle, the current Release Team Lead must update membership to the aforementioned GitHub team.
The actual process of maintaining milestones is owned by the SIGs and special elected contributors. The SIG release team steers the enhancement through the release cycle and take care that only well maintained enhancements will make it up to a new major release.
The process for filing an enhancement exception can be found here.
The diagram below shows a high level overview of tasks of the release team sub teams (CI Signal, Bug Triage, Enhancements, Docs, Comms, Release Notes) during a release cycle.
graph LR
START([Start of Release Cycle])
START --> SET
START --> MONITOR
EF --> FBOD
EF --> CMT
EIP --> CF
CF --> DPD
TF --> FDRN
END((Release Day))
TEST --> END
EAARB --> END
DCF --> END
FBRD --> END
RNC --> END
subgraph Enhancements
SET[Start Enhancements Tracking] --> EF[Enhancements Freeze]
EF --> CF[Code Freeze]
CF --> TF[Test Freeze]
end
subgraph Docs
DPD[Docs Placeholder Deadline] --> DRD[Docs Ready For Review Deadline]
DRD --> DCF[Docs Complete Deadline]
end
subgraph Comms
FBOD[Feature Blog Opt-in Deadline] --> RBRD[Release Blog Ready For Review Deadline]
RBRD --> FBRD[Feature Blogs Ready For Review Deadline]
end
subgraph Release Notes
CMT[Start Collecting Major Themes] --> FDRN[Start Final Draft of Release Notes]
FDRN --> RNC[Release Note Complete]
end
subgraph Bug Triage
TA[Track All Issues and PRs] --> EIP[Escalate Issues and PRs]
TF --> EAARB[Ensure Attention on Any Release-Blocking and Major Bug Fix PRs]
end
subgraph CI Signal
MONITOR[Monitor E2E Tests and All Jobs In SIG Release Dashboards]
MONITOR --> OPEN[Open Issues For Failing Or Flaking Jobs]
CF --> ESCALATE[Escalate Any New Failures]
OPEN --> ESCALATE
EAARB --> TEST[Ensure Tests have Stabilized]
ESCALATE --> TEST
end
classDef cluster fill:#fff,stroke:#bbb,stroke-width:2px,color:#326ce5;
classDef plain fill:#ddd,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:4px,color:#000;
classDef k8s fill:#326ce5,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:4px,color:#fff;
class START,END plain;
class SET,EF k8s;
class DPD,DRD,DCF k8s;
class FBOD,RBRD,FBRD k8s;
class CMT,FDRN,RNC k8s;
class TA,EIP,TF k8s;
class MONITOR,OPEN,CF,ESCALATE,EAARB,TEST k8s;
The diagram below provides an overview of the work done by KEP authors during the release process and how it relates to release deadlines.
graph TD
KEP_AUTHOR([KEP AUTHOR]) --> DISCUSS
subgraph Release Team Schedule
START[Start of Release Cycle]
START_ENHANCEMENTS_TRACKING[Start Enhancements Tracking]
ENHANCEMENTS_FREEZE[Enhancements Freeze]
FEATURE_BLOG_FREEZE[Feature Blog Freeze]
CODE_FREEZE[Code Freeze]
DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_FREEZE[Docs Placeholder PR Deadline]
TEST_FREEZE[Test Freeze]
DOCS_READY_FOR_REVIEW[Docs PR Ready For Review Deadline]
FEATURE_BLOG_READY_FOR_REVIEW[Feature Blog PR Ready For Review Deadline]
DOCS_FREEZE[Docs Freeze]
END[Release Day]
START --> START_ENHANCEMENTS_TRACKING
START_ENHANCEMENTS_TRACKING --> ENHANCEMENTS_FREEZE
ENHANCEMENTS_FREEZE --> FEATURE_BLOG_FREEZE
FEATURE_BLOG_FREEZE --> CODE_FREEZE
CODE_FREEZE --> DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_FREEZE
DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_FREEZE --> TEST_FREEZE
TEST_FREEZE --> DOCS_READY_FOR_REVIEW
DOCS_READY_FOR_REVIEW --> DOCS_FREEZE
DOCS_FREEZE --> FEATURE_BLOG_READY_FOR_REVIEW
FEATURE_BLOG_READY_FOR_REVIEW --> END
end
subgraph Before the Release
DISCUSS[Introduce and discuss your enhancements with sponsoring and participating SIGs]
ISSUE[Create or Update Enhancement Issue]
KEP[Create or Update Kubernetes Enhancements Proposal]
DISCUSS --> ISSUE
ISSUE --> KEP
end
subgraph During the Release
OPT_IN[Opt-in to the Release]
KEP_DONE[KEP Approved and Merged]
CODE_COMPLETE[All k/k PRs Merged]
TEST_COMPLETE[All Test PRs Merged]
FEATURE_BLOG_OPT_IN[Opt-in for Feature Blog]
FEATURE_BLOG_POST_COMPLETE[Complete Feature Blog]
DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_COMPLETE[Docs Placeholder PR Created]
DOCS_READY_TO_REVIEW_COMPLETE[Docs Finished, PR Ready for Review]
DOCS_COMPLETE[k/website PR Merged]
KEP --> OPT_IN
OPT_IN --> |Work On KEP| KEP_DONE
KEP_DONE --> |Work On Code| CODE_COMPLETE
KEP_DONE --> |Work On Draft Doc| DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_COMPLETE
KEP_DONE --> |Work On Test| TEST_COMPLETE
KEP_DONE --> | Optional | FEATURE_BLOG_OPT_IN
FEATURE_BLOG_OPT_IN --------> |Work On Blog Post| FEATURE_BLOG_POST_COMPLETE
DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_COMPLETE --> |Complete Doc| DOCS_READY_TO_REVIEW_COMPLETE
DOCS_READY_TO_REVIEW_COMPLETE ---> |Address Feedback From Reviewers | DOCS_COMPLETE
end
subgraph After the Release
END --> FEATURE_BLOG_PUBLISHED[Feature Blogs Published]
end
OPT_IN -.- START_ENHANCEMENTS_TRACKING
KEP_DONE -.- ENHANCEMENTS_FREEZE
CODE_COMPLETE -.- CODE_FREEZE
TEST_COMPLETE -.- TEST_FREEZE
DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_COMPLETE -.- DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_FREEZE
DOCS_READY_TO_REVIEW_COMPLETE -.- DOCS_READY_FOR_REVIEW
DOCS_COMPLETE -.- DOCS_FREEZE
FEATURE_BLOG_OPT_IN -.- FEATURE_BLOG_FREEZE
FEATURE_BLOG_POST_COMPLETE -.- FEATURE_BLOG_READY_FOR_REVIEW
classDef cluster fill:#fff,stroke:#bbb,stroke-width:2px,color:#326ce5;
classDef plain fill:#ddd,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:4px,color:#000;
classDef k8s fill:#326ce5,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:4px,color:#fff;
class KEP_AUTHOR plain;
class START,ENHANCEMENTS_FREEZE,FEATURE_BLOG_FREEZE,CODE_FREEZE,DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_FREEZE,TEST_FREEZE,START_ENHANCEMENTS_TRACKING,DOCS_READY_FOR_REVIEW,FEATURE_BLOG_READY_FOR_REVIEW,DOCS_FREEZE,END,FEATURE_BLOG_PUBLISHED k8s;
class DISCUSS,ISSUE,KEP k8s;
class OPT_IN,KEP_DONE,CODE_COMPLETE,TEST_COMPLETE,DOCS_PLACEHOLDER_COMPLETE,DOCS_READY_TO_REVIEW_COMPLETE,DOCS_COMPLETE,FEATURE_BLOG_OPT_IN,FEATURE_BLOG_POST_COMPLETE k8s;