You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In functions like recursive-validate we're passing in a sequence of strings that indicate whether a given step is an equivalence/equality step or an implication step.
We probably ought to be using keywords like :equals and :implies (and :follows-from when we implement that in #75) instead of just strings.
I also wonder if passing in these parallel sequences is the best bet here. We could instead have a single, structured input instead. That might simplify some things where, for example, we currently have to worry about the number of rules and expressions not lining up correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In functions like
recursive-validate
we're passing in a sequence of strings that indicate whether a given step is an equivalence/equality step or an implication step.We probably ought to be using keywords like
:equals
and:implies
(and:follows-from
when we implement that in #75) instead of just strings.I also wonder if passing in these parallel sequences is the best bet here. We could instead have a single, structured input instead. That might simplify some things where, for example, we currently have to worry about the number of rules and expressions not lining up correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: