Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Namespace QuadTree system #38

Open
Dezzles opened this issue Mar 3, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Namespace QuadTree system #38

Dezzles opened this issue Mar 3, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Dezzles
Copy link
Contributor

Dezzles commented Mar 3, 2019

As suggested in #37
We should move QuadTree classes into namespaces
As recommended by @shiffman, one of

  • QuadTree
  • qt
  • qt5
@shiffman
Copy link
Member

shiffman commented Mar 3, 2019

Any thoughts on what naming would make the most sense, is the most typical for JS libraries? Should we break the classes out into separate files and have a simple build system?

@Dezzles
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dezzles commented Mar 3, 2019

I think breaking things up into separate files and having a build system is a good idea, I've not done that step before so I'd be keen to have a bit of a play around.
I like the idea of qt5 to line up a little with p5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants